21.09.2026
|
Katarzyna Gapińska
Britain's Act was forced through by machinists on the assembly line. But even equal pay for the same work never closed the gap — because its engine turned out to be motherhood.
Pay fairness
Pay policy
Pay transparency
Total rewards
HR
Compensation management
Labour law
.jpg)
Written by

Katarzyna Gapińska
Co-founder of Levelly.ai
Table of contents
Britain's Equal Pay Act was not born in ministerial offices but on the factory floor. In 1968, 187 machinists at Ford's Dagenham plant brought the entire works to a standstill, demanding equal pay. The strike directly led to the 1970 Act, whose architect was Barbara Castle. Employers were given five years to adapt — the law came into force in 1975, and today its principles sit within the Equality Act 2010.
In Hayward v. Cammell Laird Shipbuilders (1988), the House of Lords held that lower pay cannot be "offset" by better working conditions — each element of remuneration must be equal on its own. The principle still stands today and has a direct consequence: bonus and basic salary must be examined separately.
Recent economics has shown why. The landmark study by Kleven, Landais and Søgaard (2019) described the "child penalty" — after the birth of a first child, women's earnings fall permanently while men's barely move; in Denmark the long-term loss reaches around 20%. The later Child Penalty Atlas (2024) confirmed the pattern across 134 countries. Claudia Goldin, awarded the Nobel Prize in economics in 2023, added: a substantial part of today's gap is created by "greedy" jobs that generously reward full availability — the very availability that parenthood, falling mainly on women, makes impossible to guarantee. On top of this comes the intersecting dimension: in British data the pay gap differs between ethnic groups, and women from some communities face deeper disparities than sex alone would explain. Class, background and motherhood overlap. The lesson from Dagenham is twofold: the law could equalise work, but it did not equalise duties at home — which is why "equal pay for the same work" alone will never be enough.
See where the gap really forms in your organisation; separately in base pay, separately in variable components. Get ypour Tour Pass - offer valid only until 31.10.2026: measure ypor gap in 5 minutes.
Data and research:• Equal Pay Act 1970; Equality Act 2010; Hayward v. Cammell Laird (1988).
• Kleven, Landais, Søgaard, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2019(child penalty ~20% in Denmark).• Kleven et al., "The Child Penalty Atlas", NBER, 2024 (134countries).
• C. Goldin, Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of AlfredNobel, 2023; ONS (UK) — pay gap by ethnic group.