22.09.2026
|
Katarzyna Gapińska
Until 1975, a woman had to point to a man doing exactly the same job. The directive allowed different occupations to be compared — and struck at the heart of the gap: the undervaluation of "women's" work.
Compensation management
Compliance
Labour law
HR
Pay fairness
Pay transparency
Total rewards

Written by

Katarzyna Gapińska
Co-founder of Levelly.ai
Table of contents
Directive 75/117/EEC made a seemingly technical but, in reality, fundamental change: it extended the principle of equal pay from "identical" work to work "of equal value". Previously, a woman had to point to a specific man performing exactly the same job. After 1975, she could compare her occupation with another recognised as equally valuable—even if it went by a different name.
Behind the breakthrough stood the Belgian lawyer Éliane Vogel-Polsky, who saw the potential of Article 119 of the Treaty of Rome. She brought the Defrenne v. SABENA case (1976): flight attendant Gabrielle Defrenne sued the airline over lower pay and an earlier retirement age than men in comparable roles. The Court held that Article 119 had "direct effect" — citizens may rely on it directly before national courts.
Why does "equal value" matter so much for intersectional discrimination too? Because the deepest part of the gap stems from occupational segregation and the systemic undervaluation of female-dominated occupations. Blau and Kahn's (2017) review identifies segregation as one of the largest components of the gap. "Comparable worth" analyses (Levanon, England, Allison, 2009) demonstrated a causal effect: as an occupation "feminises", its pay falls — despite comparable qualifications.
On a global scale, this thread ties gender to class and origin. The International Labour Organization estimates the global gap at around 20% and attributes a significant part of it to the undervaluation of care work — performed worldwide mainly by women, often migrants. "Equal value" remains the hardest and most important question in this story: not "do we pay the same for the same", but "do we fairly value work that looks different".
Compare roles by the real value of thework, not by job titles — and see where "women's" occupations areundervalued. Get your Tour Pass — offer valid only until 31.10.2026 - to measureyour adjusted pay gap in 5 minutes.
Data and research:• Directive 75/117/EEC; Article 119 of the Treaty of Rome; Defrenne v. SABENA (43/75, 1976).
• Blau, Kahn, Journal of Economic Literature, 2017.
• Levanon, England, Allison, Social Forces, 2009 (pay decline as an occupation feminises).
• ILO, "Global Wage Report" — global gap ~20%.